Turning uncertainty into a structured, low-risk hiring decision.

Longstanding Professional Relationship

I have known Jack, not his real name, for more than twenty-eight years, ever since I started my career as an executive recruiter. Even though we never worked for the same company, we developed a lasting friendship and often collaborated professionally. Over time, we became sounding boards for each other, frequently sharing our experiences and frustrations within the industry.

Recent Conversation and Context

About two weeks ago, Jack reached out to me. After exchanging pleasantries and joking about life, he explained the reason for his call. Jack had presented what he believed was the ideal candidate for a client, but was unable to close the deal. Frustrated and confused, he sought my advice. He wanted to know if I had experienced a comparable situation and my resolution. Before offering any suggestions, I asked Jack to provide a complete overview of his assignment.

Assignment: COO Search for Restaurant Group

Jack described the objective of the search: to find a Chief Operating Officer for a small restaurant group with two to three locations. The group’s owner is a millennial. Jack identified a candidate who met all the requirements for the position. The candidate has experience as a manager at high-volume casual-dining restaurants for established brands. He also has excellent references from individuals known to the client. Despite the candidate’s strong qualifications, the client is hesitant to make an offer, but he is unable to articulate his discomfort.

The client’s sole complaint was that the candidate was overly talkative in interviews. Considering the candidate’s twenty-year tenure at his previous job, it should be no surprise that he has limited recent interview experience.

Potential Issues and Benefits

One concern I raised was that the candidate’s long tenure at his previous employer,  while admirable, might pose a risk for the hiring manager. Assimilating into a new company culture after twenty years in one organization can be challenging. However, the risk of assimilation can be mitigated. The client could plan appropriate measures to facilitate a smooth transition.

I also asked Jack if the client’s discomfort was due to the candidate’s age. I have found that some Millennial hiring managers have a bias against Baby Boomers and Gen Xers. Their rationale is multifaceted, with technical competence and the ability to relate to younger generations as the primary justification. Jack did not seem to know if this was part of the client’s thinking. It would be most unfortunate if the Client had a bias against the candidate because of his age. After all, the candidate has demonstrated success under the exact circumstances. Furthermore, Millennials’ job tenures are notoriously short, as they prefer frequent job changes as a career advancement strategy. Mature candidates offer greater stability.

Benefits of Hiring Mature Candidates

• • Baby boomers and Gen Xers are dependable employees.
  • They possess experience in their fields.
  • They tend to change jobs less often, offering greater stability to employers.
  • They have received excellent training and development from major brands.

Recommendations for Moving Forward

I advised Jack to try to help the client become more comfortable with the candidate. One option would be to engage an industrial psychologist to speak with the candidate, including diagnostic assessments, to better understand his personality and management style. Another approach could involve hiring the candidate on a limited-time contract to evaluate his performance in live operations.

Current Status and Reflections

Two weeks after our conversation, I followed up with Jack to see how the situation had progressed. Unfortunately, nothing had changed. As Jack described, the process is still in limbo—the client has not rejected the candidate but has not shown interest in moving forward either. A meeting with an Industrial Psychologist was not scheduled. Jack resumed his search for additional candidates.

This outcome is regrettable. The client may have missed an opportunity to hire an excellent manager. I empathize with Jack, given the effort he invested in the search. He cannot compel the client to hire the candidate. However, he may be able to guide the client toward clarification of his trepidation. A low-cost, low-risk solution would be to contract the candidate on a 1099 basis for a trial period, allowing the client to assess his performance firsthand. It may be useful for the client to discuss this situation with an industrial psychologist. If he has not done so, it might be useful for the client to take a diagnostic assessment to better understand his strengths and weaknesses in decision-making.

Jim Weber – Managing Partner,  ITB Partners

I hope you enjoyed our perspective and would like to receive regular posts directly in your email inbox. To this end, please put your contact information on my mailing list.

Your feedback helps me continue publishing articles you want to read.  Your input is important to me, so please don’t hesitate to share your thoughts.

Jim.Weber@itbpartners.com