Category: Company Cultures

Posted on

Navigating a Challenging Hiring Situation

Turning uncertainty into a structured, low-risk hiring decision.

Longstanding Professional Relationship

I have known Jack, not his real name, for more than twenty-eight years, ever since I started my career as an executive recruiter. Even though we never worked for the same company, we developed a lasting friendship and often collaborated professionally. Over time, we became sounding boards for each other, frequently sharing our experiences and frustrations within the industry.

Recent Conversation and Context

About two weeks ago, Jack reached out to me. After exchanging pleasantries and joking about life, he explained the reason for his call. Jack had presented what he believed was the ideal candidate for a client, but was unable to close the deal. Frustrated and confused, he sought my advice. He wanted to know if I had experienced a comparable situation and my resolution. Before offering any suggestions, I asked Jack to provide a complete overview of his assignment.

Assignment: COO Search for Restaurant Group

Jack described the objective of the search: to find a Chief Operating Officer for a small restaurant group with two to three locations. The group’s owner is a millennial. Jack identified a candidate who met all the requirements for the position. The candidate has experience as a manager at high-volume casual-dining restaurants for established brands. He also has excellent references from individuals known to the client. Despite the candidate’s strong qualifications, the client is hesitant to make an offer, but he is unable to articulate his discomfort.

The client’s sole complaint was that the candidate was overly talkative in interviews. Considering the candidate’s twenty-year tenure at his previous job, it should be no surprise that he has limited recent interview experience.

Potential Issues and Benefits

One concern I raised was that the candidate’s long tenure at his previous employer,  while admirable, might pose a risk for the hiring manager. Assimilating into a new company culture after twenty years in one organization can be challenging. However, the risk of assimilation can be mitigated. The client could plan appropriate measures to facilitate a smooth transition.

I also asked Jack if the client’s discomfort was due to the candidate’s age. I have found that some Millennial hiring managers have a bias against Baby Boomers and Gen Xers. Their rationale is multifaceted, with technical competence and the ability to relate to younger generations as the primary justification. Jack did not seem to know if this was part of the client’s thinking. It would be most unfortunate if the Client had a bias against the candidate because of his age. After all, the candidate has demonstrated success under the exact circumstances. Furthermore, Millennials’ job tenures are notoriously short, as they prefer frequent job changes as a career advancement strategy. Mature candidates offer greater stability.

Benefits of Hiring Mature Candidates

    • Baby boomers and Gen Xers are dependable employees.
    • They possess experience in their fields.
    • They tend to change jobs less often, offering greater stability to employers.
    • They have received excellent training and development from major brands.

Recommendations for Moving Forward

I advised Jack to try to help the client become more comfortable with the candidate. One option would be to engage an industrial psychologist to speak with the candidate, including diagnostic assessments, to better understand his personality and management style. Another approach could involve hiring the candidate on a limited-time contract to evaluate his performance in live operations.

Current Status and Reflections

Two weeks after our conversation, I followed up with Jack to see how the situation had progressed. Unfortunately, nothing had changed. As Jack described, the process is still in limbo—the client has not rejected the candidate but has not shown interest in moving forward either. A meeting with an Industrial Psychologist was not scheduled. Jack resumed his search for additional candidates.

This outcome is regrettable. The client may have missed an opportunity to hire an excellent manager. I empathize with Jack, given the effort he invested in the search. He cannot compel the client to hire the candidate. However, he may be able to guide the client toward clarification of his trepidation. A low-cost, low-risk solution would be to contract the candidate on a 1099 basis for a trial period, allowing the client to assess his performance firsthand. It may be useful for the client to discuss this situation with an industrial psychologist. If he has not done so, it might be useful for the client to take a diagnostic assessment to better understand his strengths and weaknesses in decision-making.

I appreciate your interest in ITB Partners.  For further information about ITB Partners and its Value-Added Strategy, please visit our website at www.itbpartners.com, or contact Jim Weber.

 

Jim Weber – Managing Partner,  ITB Partners

I hope you enjoyed our perspective and would like to receive regular posts directly in your email inbox. To this end, please put your contact information on my mailing list.

Your feedback helps me continue publishing articles you want to read.  Your input is important to me, so please don’t hesitate to share your thoughts.

Jim.Weber@itbpartners.com

Posted on

It’s Either Us or Them!

Winter just kicked in at our home. Reality bites. Fortunately, this was the most pleasant Autumn I can remember since moving to the Atlanta Metro Area.  The evenings were ideal for after-dinner cigars and cocktails on the deck.  I took full advantage of this opportunity. My usual guest on these occasions is John, an Alumni Buddy and cigar aficionado.  My wife often joins us, although I have not been able to interest her in a cigar.   The discussion usually begins with an update from John regarding his recent job challenges.  I mostly listen and ask clarifying questions while enjoying my cigar.  When he has completed his recap, he expects to hear my thoughts.

 

My friend’s employer is transitioning from a small company to a professionally managed retail corporation. His updates are disappointing, as the same problems persist without resolution.  In other words, the bureaucracy at the corporate office is in control.  John often complains about additional responsibilities heaped upon store-level management by senior staff.  Rather than breaking down barriers that inhibit customer service and store-level productivity, more tasks are assigned to personnel.   The irony is that this company has sufficient data-processing capabilities to recover and analyze whatever information it requires.  Simple programming at the corporate office can achieve the required results. There is no need to burden the stores with any additional reports.  John never talks about the brand’s mission, values, or culture.   Based on what he has said, his company has not defined its core values and cultural imperatives. I am further confused by the lack of field-level merchandising, training, and recruiting support.  It does not seem to be a priority for the company.

 

I am reminded of the advice my new boss gave me early in my career.  I was recently promoted to a multi-unit, General Management role for a prominent mall retailer. I was being briefed on the strengths and weaknesses of my new management team.  He was sharing his thoughts on personnel decisions that I was likely to make.  He gave me clear directions on the personnel changes I should make. He said, “It’s either us or them.” That did not sit well with me.  Instinctively, I knew that my success depended on my team’s success. I recognized that our total success was about leadership and development, bringing everyone along together.  However, that wasn’t the gist of his message.  He was an Old School, a top-down manager.  He was clear about achieving compliance, not about improving productivity.    He did not focus on personnel development, teamwork, or leadership.  His message reflected the prevailing management style at many companies.  That was about to change.

At that time, managing culture was not on the radar screen for most companies.  They were focused on hiring the best talent possible from the horde of Baby Boomers entering the workforce.  Brands were organized into silos with little attention given to internal communication or integration.  It seemed like the Finance and Accounting Departments were in control.

By the mid-1980s, things began to change.  Portfolio Management Theory, which espoused organizing public companies into conglomerates, was discredited.  Tom Peters’ book “In Search of Excellence” proclaimed the virtues of focusing on what you do best.  The message spoke to specialization.  Silo’s began to crumble.  Matrix Management came into vogue.  Leadership and culture management started to gain traction.

 

My favorite employer worked to create a culture that was driven from the bottom up. In other words, the mission of senior leadership was to make job functions more efficient. An intense focus on helping team members better serve their customers improved the company’s profitability.  Innovation was encouraged throughout the organization. Team members were given tools and training to test promising ideas with proper oversight. Store tours focused on fact-finding to identify and eliminate barriers to excellent customer service and to support store personnel’s success.   Unnecessary and counterproductive activities were rooted out and eliminated.  This company recognized that corporate success depended on empowering employees who interfaced directly with customers.  They were ahead of the curve, proven by their results.

Other employers focused little on defining their company’s ideal culture.  As a result, there was no active management of their cultures. Not surprisingly, the weakest cultures tended to reward wrong behavior. Often, politicians were promoted over the actual performers.  Some cultures supported hypercompetitive, intra-personal competition over collaboration and teamwork.  These cultures could not be sustained in the long run.

Conclusion

Today, savvy leaders compete to attract and retain the best talent by fostering a culture that empowers customer service. They avoid piling on unnecessary tasks and seek other ways to capture information as needed. These employers understand that a healthy culture is more important than ever for attracting and retaining great employees.  It’s about them!

I appreciate your interest in ITB Partners.  For further information about ITB Partners and its Value-Added Strategy, please visit our website at www.itbpartners.com, or contact Jim Weber.

 

Jim Weber – Managing Partner,  ITB Partners

I hope you enjoyed our perspective and would like to receive regular posts directly in your email inbox. To this end, please put your contact information on my mailing list.

Your feedback helps me continue publishing articles you want to read.  Your input is important to me, so please don’t hesitate to share your thoughts.

Jim.Weber@itbpartners.com

Posted on

Unlocking Hidden Brilliance:

 How to Identify and Maximize the Potential of Underutilized Employees

Board Meeting

Every organization has talented employees whose full potential goes untapped. Often, they’re not underperforming; they’re underutilized. This guide helps leaders and managers identify those hidden strengths, align roles with skills, and implement strategies that transform quiet competence into active contribution, improving engagement, innovation, and overall performance across the organization.

Key Takeaways

Underutilized employees are often untapped assets rather than underperformers. To unlock their potential:

    • Recognize misalignment between role, skills, and motivation.
    • Use transparent feedback loops and skill-mapping tools.
    • Offer structured learning pathways and career visibility.
    • Combine empathy with measurable development frameworks.

Hidden Talent: The Problem Few Leaders Talk About

All organizations have dependable yet unchanging employees.  They attend meetings, complete tasks, and clock out. What’s missing isn’t talent; it’s direction. Leaders often confuse underutilization with disengagement, when it’s really misplacement.

Research from Gallup’s workplace analytics suggests that only one in three employees feels their strengths are used daily. That’s not a performance problem — it’s an allocation issue.

Why This Matters

When capable employees remain underused:

    • Innovation stalls.
    • Engagement drops.
    • Retention costs skyrocket.

In contrast, leaders who identify and reassign latent skills often see measurable productivity spikes, sometimes up to 20%, according to Harvard Business Review.

How to Spot Underutilized Employees

Signal What It Might Mean Recommended Action
Consistent, average performance Lack of challenge Assign stretch projects or cross-functional work
Low participation in discussions Confidence or recognition gap Offer mentorship or presentation opportunities
Frequent “I can help with that” moments Hidden expertise Create a skills inventory or peer-training system
High engagement on side projects Misaligned role fit Reassess career path and internal mobility options
Silent but steady contributors Introverted leadership style Use one-on-one sessions to surface insights

The Skill Reclamation Framework

A simple 4-step system helps managers reclaim dormant capability:

    1. Detect Misalignment – Compare actual responsibilities with skill inventory.
    2. Clarify Goals – Ask employees what energizes them — and what drains them.
    3. Design a Growth Track – Create rotational assignments or innovation labs.
    4. Measure Growth – Track progress via peer feedback, KPIs, or development sprints.

For broader frameworks, SHRM’s career mapping resources and CIPD’s employee engagement resources are excellent starting points.

Investing in Continuous Learning

Encouraging employees to pursue additional training or education is one of the most effective ways to close skill gaps and re-engage talent. Many organizations now support flexible, accredited programs that align with employee career goals.

Online degree pathways, such as Computer Science bachelor’s programs, allow full-time professionals to build technical fluency while balancing work and study. By earning a computer science degree, employees can deepen their understanding of IT systems, programming, and core computational theory — skills that often translate directly into business innovation and cross-departmental efficiency.

Frequently Asked Questions

How do I know if someone’s underutilized vs. disengaged?
 Look for curiosity. Underutilized employees ask “why.” Disengaged ones stop asking altogether.

What if reassigning roles isn’t possible?
 Add autonomy within the current scope — let them lead micro-projects, mentor peers, or redesign small processes.

Is this about giving them more work?
 Not more meaningful. Align responsibilities with what builds mastery and trust.

How often should I reassess skill alignment?
 Quarterly check-ins keep role-fit dynamic and avoid skill decay.

Strategic Pathways to Maximize Potential

    1. Make Skills Visible
      Create an internal, living database of team skills and certifications. When skills are visible, managers can match the right people to high-impact projects, increasing engagement and collaboration.
    2. Expand Development Access
      Subsidize online learning, micro-credentials, and professional certifications. This investment not only boosts competence but also signals that your organization values continuous growth.
    3. Promote Career Flexibility
      Enable lateral movement programs that let employees explore adjacent roles. This combats burnout, increases retention, and strengthens overall adaptability.
    4. Recognize Meaningful Contributions
      Move beyond job titles when rewarding achievements. Recognizing innovative thinking, process improvements, and peer mentoring can elevate morale and loyalty.
    5. Build Mentorship Networks
      Pair high-performing veterans with quieter, under-the-radar contributors. This encourages knowledge flow, builds confidence, and integrates diverse perspectives into problem-solving.

Building Growth Channels

Organizations that thrive make skill expansion a system, not a perk.
Here are some tools and programs that make that possible:

Spotlight Resource

Miro offers a library of team-building and skill-mapping templates that help visualize employee strengths. Managers can use these to design better team compositions and reduce redundancy — turning visibility into velocity.

Quick Actions

      • Conduct a quarterly “hidden strengths” audit.
      • Introduce one skill-sharing session per month.
      • Build an internal talent mobility dashboard.
      • Align project roles to motivation, not just experience.
      • Encourage self-led learning with time and resources.

Conclusion

Underutilization is not a flaw in people — it’s a gap in system design. The most successful leaders treat their workforce like an evolving ecosystem: adaptable, intelligent, and filled with latent value. Recognize it, realign it, and you don’t just boost performance — you build belonging.

I appreciate your interest in ITB Partners.  For further information about ITB Partners and its Value-Added Strategy, please visit our website at www.itbpartners.com, or contact Jim Weber.

 

Jim Weber – Managing Partner,  ITB Partners

I hope you enjoyed our perspective and would like to receive regular posts directly in your email inbox. To this end, please put your contact information on my mailing list.

Your feedback helps me continue publishing articles you want to read.  Your input is important to me, so please don’t hesitate to share your thoughts.

Jim.Weber@itbpartners.com

Posted on

Don’t Become a Hostage!

Jim Weber – President
New Century Dynamics Executive Search

Recently, I have become aware of two situations where managers have become hostages to toxic employees. They are not being held at gunpoint by a criminal trying to negotiate an escape. However, the angst of the situation is similar. One is a female assistant manager for a big-box retailer. She does not work well with others and is actively working to undermine another manager. Not a team player, she creates unnecessary drama. My colleague, Stan, would call her a termite. Someone who destroys the foundation of the company. The other is a subcontractor with poor work habits who delivers an inconsistent product. Both have remained in position because management, facing a difficult labor market, has decided to live with these troublesome people, hoping to avoid the cost of losing them. However, one manager chose to act and found that his fears were unwarranted.

During my corporate career, workers were abundant, so the fear of being understaffed was not a consideration. At that time, the concern for turnover and overstaffing was our focus. Even so, I observed managers fail to discipline employees properly because they delivered outstanding revenue and profit performance. Those producers survived until their financial performance fell below standard. In the meantime, their peers complained about favoritism and unfair treatment by management. It was very frustrating to be a part of those teams. Overall morale suffered because management was held hostage by a flawed subordinate who happened to produce above-average financial results.

Today, we face a different, more difficult labor market. Baby Boomers are retiring, and fewer younger workers are available to replace them. Employers are finding it more challenging to achieve optimal staffing levels. Some managers overlook employee performance issues to minimize the risk of being short-staffed. That was the concern of my client. He was willing to put up with the poor performance of one sub-contractor to ensure that he completed his projects on time.

Nevertheless, I advised him to deal with the performance issue. I informed my client that the situation was sure to worsen. Eventually, he reached his limit when the cost of repairing the subcontractor’s shoddy work became unbearable. With a little bit of effort, he was able to find a suitable replacement. He refused to be a hostage.

It is not uncommon for managers to overestimate the cost of maintaining employee discipline and underestimate the benefit. Sometimes, it is easier to look the other way. They rationalize their decision to minimize the performance issues or ignore them entirely. Avoidance is a big mistake. The rest of the team is closely watching. They view the manager’s lack of action as favoritism and poor leadership. The team’s overall performance eventually suffers, and good employees leave for other jobs. The manager’s failure to deal with performance issues creates more significant problems with greater consequences.

So, what is one to do? First, don’t become a hostage to your employees! Enforce policy uniformly across the workforce. Don’t give a pass to employees who generate stellar results in some areas but fall short in others. Consistently enforced standards and appropriate disciplinary measures will go a long way toward creating a healthy, high-performance culture. This approach to discipline will help reduce turnover and attract better-quality employees.

Another viable strategy is to maintain an ongoing recruiting program. You may not need to step up the actual hiring, but you will know where to go to find good employees when you need them.

The two examples I presented at the beginning of this article make an interesting case study.  One client decided to face the performance issue head-on, resulting in the termination of the sub-contractor in question. My client replaced the subcontractor with a more appropriate hire. The client refused to be held hostage. The other situation has deteriorated further as the management refuses to take corrective action.

Maintaining organizational discipline is not optional. Success requires vigilant maintenance of systems, processes, and procedures. Maintaining discipline may be more difficult in trying times, but it is of greater importance. The stakes are higher, as is the risk of failure. Good employees will gravitate to the best employers, so become the preferred employer in your market. Build a healthy culture of success by enforcing policy in a consistent, firm, fair, and friendly manner. It is the best way I know to ensure long-term success.

Thank you for visiting our blog.

 

Jim Weber, Managing Partner – ITB Partners

Jim Weber – Managing Partner,  ITB Partners

I hope you enjoyed our point of view and would like to receive regular posts directly to your email inbox.  Toward this end, put your contact information on my mailing list.

Your feedback helps me continue to publish articles that you want to read.  Your input is very important to me, so please leave a comment.

Posted on

Create a Culture of Collaboration

A well-functioning company is a company in which different teams and team members all easily collaborate with one another. And when that kind of successful teamwork happens, it can look so easy and organic, one might even assume that things just fell into place naturally, with no effort. But while good collaboration looks effortless, often it only comes about through multiple efforts on multiple levels. As a business owner or manager, you need to acquire the leadership skills that will allow you to facilitate that kind of teamwork. Here are some guidelines for how to master these skills and get your company running like a well-oiled machine.

The importance of collaboration.

If everyone in your company is only ever assigned to work within their own department, on their own project, they may become extremely adept at detailed work within their own professional silo but may be missing out on the opportunities that arise when teams cross over departmental borders and communicate about different projects.  And this means your company is missing out, too, because creative crossover and exchange are necessary for your company to maintain a cohesive identity. Additionally, the added energy that comes from heightened collaboration can propel company growth. Without collaboration, team members may develop unhealthy workplace attitudes, too, including suspicion, resource-hoarding, and interdepartmental tensions. Share on X

Start with the right people.

Part of getting your teams to work well together means choosing the right team members. So, when hiring, don’t just look at skill level and experience. Some novice professionals may be better than seasoned experts when it comes to working well with others. So don’t just look at a resume. Also, ask for references from former managers as well as colleagues, so you can get a sense of a candidate’s communication and collaboration skills. Also, remember not to confuse surface-level social charm with the actual ability to collaborate on a group project.

Create opportunities for collaboration.

Employees may not be aware that you are encouraging more collaboration if you don’t open avenues for them to do so. Encourage consultation between different teams and let different team members take turns leading meetings and discussion sessions. It can be a good idea to mix things up a little, by encouraging employees to switch up teams and projects – but be wary about doing this to a point that induces stress or burnout. An important way to encourage collaboration is to create spaces, both real and virtual, where all team members across departments interact, express concerns, ask questions, and develop good connections.

Foster a culture of communication and trust.

This is an area where you as a leader need to model the kind of culture you want to see in your workplace. You can’t cultivate communication and trust if you come off as suspicious, distrustful, unwilling to listen, and taking everything too personally. And you definitely should not be engaging in or tolerating toxic workplace behaviors like bullying or harassment. Instead, take time to get to know team members, listen when they have concerns, and be firm when it comes to not tolerating bad behavior. Be respectful to your team members, be authentic, and never ever violate anyone’s trust.

Invest in the right tools.

Encouraging collaboration is a lot easier when you make available the tools that facilitate it, such as templates, apps, and software that allow for better communication and information sharing. Employees will appreciate access to such tools, too, because it’s so much easier to work well on a project when you understand its place in the bigger picture. For instance, if your company is working on a new product, it’s helpful to create a product roadmap template so every team member can see where their task fits into the overall project of production and launch.

Remember that teamwork can’t be forced, but it can be modeled and encouraged. Do your part as an owner and manager to create the kind of workplace culture where collaboration happens, and this will pay off for all parties involved. Leaders in the food and beverage industry interested in fostering greater collaboration among team members may be interested in the coaching and mentoring programs offered by New Century Dynamics.

Image via Pixabay

Thank you for visiting our blog.

 

Jim Weber, Managing Partner – ITB Partners

Jim Weber – Managing Partner,  ITB Partners

I hope you enjoyed our point of view and would like to receive regular posts directly to your email inbox.  Toward this end, put your contact information on my mailing list.

Your feedback helps me continue to publish articles that you want to read.  Your input is very important to me so; please leave a comment.

 

 

Posted on

The Top HR Trends for 2022

If we learned anything from the last two years, it is that we need to adapt to how and where we work. We learned that the world is becoming increasingly more home-centered as work becomes a virtual instead of a physical environment.

As Dr. John Cascone, Sr Vice President at Flex HR notes, “The devastating effects of the pandemic have reawakened the interest in monitoring environmental influences,” and reminds leaders to plan “to adapt quickly to moderate the impact of the crisis on the organization and its employees.”

So, with this new adaptability, here are our Flex HR top HR trends predictions for 2022:

1. An Increase in ‘Employee Wellbeing’ Benefits

As we saw in 2021, there is an increasing awareness of the importance of employee well-being, including their physical and emotional health. This now includes employees’ families, and issues like health insurance and time off for employees to care for sick family members are highly valued.

One study found that 62% of employees value benefits related to well-being and are more likely to take jobs that offer those.

The Future of the Industry Report 2021 also revealed that 87% of employees want employers to value mental health.

As Jessica Stafford, Payroll Tax & Compliance Consultant at Flex HR notes, “Competitive businesses will continue to adopt unlimited paid time off policies in 2022,” which increases “productivity and morale” and presents “stronger financial statements and less work for HR and payroll departments.”

2. Hybrid Work Model Will Continue

The pandemic permanently shifted work to a hybrid model. Surveys reveal that 83% of employees want a hybrid option and 63% of growing companies have already shifted to meet this need.

Therefore, it is vital to have these hybrid and work-from-home policies in writing and in the employee handbook.

Dianne Hartness, HR Client Success Manager at Flex HR shares, “As more companies become distributed and do away with office space it is important to define culture and create connection by using digital tools.”

Some examples of collaborative tools include Slack, a communication tool that promises more productivity and a more in-sync team. Another tool is QuizBreaker, a game your team can play virtually.

3. More Use of Technology and Artificial Intelligence

As we noted at the end of 2021, the use of technology and artificial intelligence will continue to rise in the workplace. Businesses and employees have had to become proficient in using a plethora of tools to communicate, including Zoom, WebEx, Slack, Stream Yard, and Microsoft Teams, Strivr, Immerse, and BodySwaps.

The use of technology has become a top priority for companies as they seek to unify their workforces. Technologies including artificial intelligence, digital transactions, and e-commerce have changed business operations and will continue to do so.

Going forward, it is likely that AI will help HR teams make better decisions and will automate and streamline administrative tasks.

With the move to more cyber time, businesses must now increase cyber security to prevent phishing and malware.

4. Focus on Diversity, Equity & Inclusion and Other Values Matter to Employees

Another trend that is here to stay is DEI issues, which continue to matter to employees and companies alike. As many as 45% of HR professionals are planning to focus more on issues of diversity and inclusion in the coming year, as one study indicated.

Deirdre Huff, HR Client Success Manager at Flex HR, predicts that in the coming year “more employees and job seekers” will base “their decisions to accept employment offers off how well the company handles diversity, equity, and inclusion.”

In fact, Flex HR’s clients have been requesting DEI boot camps to help train their organizations in how to be more equitable and diversity-minded. Our consultants have already begun leading boot camps and informational seminars in the DEI space.

Dr. John Cascone predicts, “The trend toward promoting cultural diversity in all sectors of the organization will continue but coupled with the emphasis on diversity of ideas, values, work styles and ethics operating under clearly defined standards of accountability and outcome performance.”

One study revealed that 80% of employees choose their job based on aligned values, proving that employees want to work at companies that have similar values to their own.

Other values of importance to employees include childcare solutions and work-life balance. In fact, companies that value work-life balance will recruit and retain more employees as the millennial generation takes over the workforce.

Dr. John Cascone maintains that “Work-life balance will shape management practice to support worker accountability and productivity.”

5. Demand for Value and Development of New Skills

In 2022, there will continue to be a huge need for Human Resources expertise because HR is evolving into a much more expansive role.

One Harvard Business Review article predicted that there will be a need to train HR professionals in 21 new types of jobs in the near future. Because of these changes, HR professionals will need to acquire a wide range of skills for which companies are often not able to train them proficiently.

Businesses will need to outsource their HR to firms like Flex HR because of the complex HR challenges that they are facing.

6. Shifts in Recruiting Strategies, Especially to Internal

 With a push to develop new skills for HR and other employees, upskilling employees and shifting recruiting strategies have become essential.

Senior Vice President of Flex HR, Phil Davis, predicts “employers will continue to see higher than normal employee turnover and rapidly escalating wages” and emphasizes the “need for effective recruitment and retention programs.”

Similarly, Heather Summers, HR Client Success Manager at Flex HR, sees the need for companies to “up their game” in the recruitment department, by re-evaluating “their benefits to employees, insurance, offer sign-on bonuses or employee referral bonuses to attract talent.”

Companies that are “winning” at recruiting have realized the importance of training and hiring from within their organization.

As Dr. John Cascone predicts, “There will be a shift away from investing dollars in recruiting new employees to invest dollars in retaining and developing employees.”

Recruiters will need to be more strategic in their approach, finding creative methods for attracting quality candidates.

Different recruiting strategies will include looking for non-traditional talent from within the company, using social media and texting, making company websites look more personable and friendlier, offering higher wages and more time off, and many other strategies we noted in last year’s article on 10 Ideas for Better Recruiting to Attract More Candidates.

Upskilling and training have become essential alternatives to recruiting.

Flex HR’s Laura Ladd, HR Client Success Manager, reminds us, “Studies show that “future-oriented” organizations are making leadership psychology training and development programs mainstream. Such programs include learning about the human brain, how we think, how we analyze data, and how we make decisions.”

Going forward, Dr. John Cascone predicts, “The greater challenge for leaders will be to retain quality employees, not to recruit them Share on X.”

Thank you for visiting our blog.

 

Jim Weber, Managing Partner – ITB Partners

Jim Weber – Managing Partner,  ITB Partners

I hope you enjoyed our point of view and would like to receive regular posts directly to your email inbox.  Toward this end, put your contact information on my mailing list.

Your feedback helps me continue to publish articles that you want to read.  Your input is very important to me so; please leave a comment.

 

 

Posted on

Ten Leadership Lessons from Life at a Boys’ Ranch

Mike Perkins

Our world and our workplaces are filled with people from broken homes and dysfunctional families.  Research shows that over 60% of Americans grew up with some type of family dysfunction.  As employers, we can make a real difference in people’s lives- inside and outside the workplace. Employees need our help, guidance, teaching, encouragement, love, and support to be successful and to feel like they belong. If they get that, they are much more likely to stay with us, work hard, be loyal and make a difference.  Otherwise, they will just go through the motions, make minimal contributions, and always be looking for greener pastures.

I have been an employment attorney and HR professional for almost 30 years.  I thought I knew a lot about people from other walks of life.  But I was dead wrong.  I really didn’t know much about life for people with different upbringings and socio-economic backgrounds until I had the opportunity to live with them.  Literally.   In 2006, my wife and I took a professional sabbatical and worked for seven years at Big Oak Ranch in North Alabama.  Big Oak is a “Christian Home for Children Needing a Chance.” There, over 120 children live in homes with up to 8 children and a “Mom and Pop.”  Over those seven years, Kim and I served as house parents and primary caregivers for over a dozen boys from broken homes (abandonment, neglect, poverty, abuse, drug abuse, alcoholism, imprisonment, death).  During that time, we fed them, clothed them, helped educate them (in partnership with a great school), mentored them, disciplined them, cheered for them, laughed, and cried with them, attended proms, ballgames (hundreds!), school events, counseling sessions, medical appointments, hunting trips, vacations, provided driver training, and washed thousands of loads of dirty, stinky laundry.

In the process, we learned a LOT about life, love, and belonging.  Some of our kids responded well and have prospered.  Others have struggled with life outside the ranch. But we like to think they are all better off from having been at the boys’ ranch. I know that we are.

The lessons we learned and taught at the ranch translate well into the business world. Share on XMany of our employees come from the same type of environment as the children we helped raise.  And that lack of stability early in life has a lasting impact.  Here are a few lessons we learned that are worth sharing. Perhaps they can help you in your leadership journey.

    1. You don’t really know people until you get to know them- Everyone does not think like you do (in fact, very few do).  Don’t stereotype or prejudge. Go to them and seek to understand how they see the world.  You’ll be surprised at how differently people view things.  Each person’s unique history provides an inimitable life perspective.  Understanding a person’s background, values and worldview helps build bridges that will make you more effective as a leader and them as an employee.
    2. Rules without relationships are meaningless– Rule enforcement and management directives without relationships usually result in resentment. It is important to develop real relationships with the people you manage.  Otherwise, you will be in a constant battle to enforce workplace rules and it will be difficult to persuade employees to perform challenging tasks.  Relationship always trumps rules.
    3. Set boundaries and stick with them. How you start offsets the course for the future. Like cattle, it is human nature to look for the holes in the fences and test the boundaries. Employees want to know where the boundaries are.  Set the boundaries and close the gaps.  You can lighten up once trust is established.
    4. Teach them not to be a victim and a finger–pointer– It is easy to claim “victimhood” and blame shortcomings on the past and on others. Employees must understand that they control their own destiny and that they cannot allow the past to drag them down.  Encourage them to be chain breakers, victors, change-makers.  Direct them to community or company resources if they have difficulty overcoming past trauma or experiences. Don’t allow employees to make excuses based on the actions of others.  Help them stay focused on the things they can control.
    5. First Impressions are critical- People need to understand that, if they really want to succeed, they need to look and act the part. I am not talking about stereotypes, but a clean, positive look makes a huge difference to others and will often set the tone for their future interactions.  Sometimes, it is a matter of facial expression and good hygiene.  Manners also make a big difference- On BOTH sides!  “Hello,” “please,” “thank you,” and “you’re welcome” go a long way…
    6. When you break the rules, there are consequences– Everyone needs accountability. If we allow employees to “get away” with unacceptable performance, we hurt them, the organization, and their co-employees. Discipline should be considered a teaching process, not punishment.  Discipline should never be administered in a state of anger or passion.  The best discipline is calm, methodical, and delivered in a spirit of caring and concern.
    7. Everyone craves security- If they don’t get it from you, they will look elsewhere. At the ranch, we told the boys. “I love you; I will never lie to you; I will stick with you until you are grown and on your own; and there are rules, don’t break them.”  An employer’s version of this might be, “You are a valuable person, and we appreciate you and your work; we will never lie to you; we will stick with you during good times and bad, and there are rules, don’t break them.”  And then, do just that!
    8. Find strengths and develop them- Everyone has strengths and weaknesses. Our job as leaders is to develop our strengths and utilize them as effectively as possible.  At the same time, when employees have weaknesses, we should do everything within our power to minimize those through education, training, coaching, modifying assignments, and, where necessary, utilizing discipline.
    9. It doesn’t always work- Everyone is not coachable, and not everyone really wants to work. We owe it to them, their co-workers, and ourselves to help those employees find another career path.  Sometimes that means separation– and we shouldn’t prolong that when an employee is not working out.   Other employees may decide a particular job or company is not right for them.  Don’t slam the door on them.  Some will decide the “grass is not so green” and will want to come back.  While the grass may look greener, there is always dirt on the bottom.
    10. Love and a sense of belonging are more important than everything else. If employees feel that from their leaders, they will run through brick walls for them. Bricks hurt, so output goals will seem like a walk in the park.

Mike Perkins, President- Frontline HR Solutions

Mike is available to speak to your group/association and provides customized training for your frontline leaders.  Contact him at mperkins@frontlinehr.com

Thank you for visiting our blog.

 

Jim Weber, Managing Partner – ITB Partners

Jim Weber – Managing Partner,  ITB Partners

I hope you enjoyed our point of view and would like to receive regular posts directly to your email inbox.  Toward this end, put your contact information on my mailing list.

Your feedback helps me continue to publish articles that you want to read.  Your input is very important to me so; please leave a comment.

 

 

Posted on

Groupthink is Dangerous

This past Friday, I delivered a presentation at the January 2022 meeting of ITB Partners. The theme of the topic was about building one’s independent consulting practice by leveraging your time. One of the participants was curious about how many members were following this strategy. He was interested in learning how the broader membership viewed this issue. Are we in a bubble? Are we victims of Groupthink?  Not only did I think that was an excellent question, but I also promised to survey our wider membership to determine if their activities align with my recommendations.  This exchange reminded me of similar situations I had encountered during my corporate career.

Wikipedia;  “Groupthink – is a psychological phenomenon that occurs within a group of people in which the desire for harmony or conformity in the group results in an irrational or dysfunctional decision-making outcome. Cohesiveness, or the desire for cohesiveness, in a group may produce a tendency among its members to agree at all costs.[1] This causes the group to minimize conflict and reach a consensus decision without critical evaluation.[2][3]”

Psychologist Irving Janis calls Groupthink “a deterioration of mental efficiency. The first time I heard about the concept of Groupthink, I was an undergraduate. I wrote a short paper on the subject. At that time, I did not fully understand Groupthink as a concept. I had not witnessed it personally. It took practical experience and responsibility as a team member/leader to complete my education on this phenomenon.

Back in the day, if we thought we were limiting the full range of consideration for a question, we would ask, “are we just talking to ourselves? Are we in a bubble?”  We knew that something wasn’t working the way we expected, so we must be missing critical information. In other words, we need to get input from the market and our customers.

The most striking form of Groupthink I experienced was at the beginning of my tenure with Long John Silver‘s. During my corporate orientation, I attended a presentation from a marketing research firm. Their contract was to perform a strategic analysis of the brand. It was an incredible experience. Whereas the consensus opinion of leadership had been that our primary competition was Red Lobster, the research showed that the brand was part of a different industry segment. The consumer identified the brand as a quick-service restaurant concept, but they did not think we acted like one. The service wasn’t fast, the food was too expensive, and there were no Drive Throughs, among other issues. This revelation was a shock to leadership. The recognition that they had invested their resources trying to compete in a segment they could not win was daunting. Fortunately, those findings led to a very successful repositioning of the brand.

Effects of Groupthink

    • Group dynamics overrides effective decision-making
    • Inhibits learning
    • It may be a subliminal way to protect one’s reputation or institutional dogma.

How to recognize Groupthink

    • The leader has a most persuasive personality, domineering even.
    • Dissent is discouraged
    • The workgroup demonstrates a high degree of cohesion,
    • Peer pressure to conform,
    • Complacency, need to get along,
    • Belief in a group’s infallibility
    • Own the moral high ground
    • Tribalism

These actions lead to a lack of counterpoints and optimal decision-making. Fundamentally, it is a symptom of poorly managed human group dynamics and leadership.

How to prevent Groupthink

    • Recognize Groupthink as a pathology to be avoided
    • Develop a process to counter-act:  explore options, evaluate alternatives, encourage ideas without judgment or negative consequences,
    • Test assumptions,
    • Place a high value on objectivity.
    • Assign a devil’s advocate – seek out the counterfactual

When we formed ITB Partners, one of our goals was to develop a learning organization that was inquisitive, collaborative, and supportive of our members. In other words, a high-performance team. Google conducted research to determine how to create high-performance teams. Their findings were surprising.   “We were dead wrong. Who is on a team matters less than how the team members interact, structure their work, and view their contributions.”    Groupthink is an inhibitor to high-performance teams. To avoid Groupthink and other risks that would conflict with our goal, we instituted an annual strategic review that included a survey of the members. The Annual Review helps us stay on course to achieve a healthy culture. It has been a helpful exercise that has prevented us from taking detours unsupported by the majority of the members.

Groupthink is something to be avoided by all goal-oriented teams. Regrettably, it is a phenomenon that is all too common in the broader culture. Share on XWe have seen it exercised in Academia, Major Corporations, the Media, and even in government, leading to well-document disasters. No institution is immune to its intrusion. If you want to foster growth and learning, recognize the risk of Groupthink and build systems to ensure that it never takes hold in your team.

For more information on Groupthink, check out these articles.

https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newLDR_82.

htmhttps://ethicsunwrapped.utexas.edu/glossary/groupthink

Thank you for visiting our blog.

 

Jim Weber, Managing Partner – ITB Partners

Jim Weber – Managing Partner,  ITB Partners

I hope you enjoyed our point of view and would like to receive regular posts directly to your email inbox.  Toward this end, put your contact information on my mailing list.

Your feedback helps me continue to publish articles that you want to read.  Your input is very important to me so; please leave a comment.

 

 

 

Posted on

Build for Success

This week I had an interesting conversation with a senior executive recently released from a major brand. Let’s call him John. He has the benefit of an Outplacement Program, which will be helpful as he has not had to look for a new job in a very long time.  He reconnected with me to discuss his situation and to seek my help. John was interested in my opinion of his goals relative to the current market for his skill set.

John gave me the background on his separation, saying that it related primarily to the COVID-19 pandemic.   His former company is restructuring to better adapt to the competitive situation, eliminating his position.  He went on to say that their culture has deteriorated. He said it had reached a point where he no longer felt comfortable working there.  He was upbeat about his prospects, however.

John’s recap surprised me as his company has executed a successful re-positioning program. It has been rocking the market.  I was disappointed to hear about their current situation. I had thought their culture was far stronger given their recent success.

When I ask job seekers to describe the ideal situation they seek, I usually hear the same response. People are looking for a growing brand with products they respect. They want to join a company that is a good corporate citizen with a healthy culture that rewards excellence.  You know, utopia.  More precisely, a major brand like the one they just left, only better.  John was not an exception.  He is looking for the same thing. However, he will soon learn that his opportunity is with emerging brands, not established companies.

The demand for people like John is with companies that can only aspire to his ideal at some future date. Even before the effects of the pandemic, employers were more focused on maintaining their competitive position and profitability than building a culture for long-term success. These companies are struggling to remain relevant.

I do not mean to say that no one is trying to create a great work environment. I have several clients, albeit mostly startups and emerging brands, that are making an effort to build distinctive cultures.  They are following established models that support standard management practices.  I applaud their wisdom and enjoy helping them staff their team.

Other clients have become spectacular failures, in part because they did not make it a priority to create a culture supportive of their ambitions. In some cases, the culture was rotten at the very top of the organization. In one situation, the Executive Team was so out of sync regarding strategy and execution that they inadvertently created a chaotic environment. The result was Chapter 11 reorganization and, ultimately, liquidation of the business.  I could write a book about that situation, but the short story is an excellent concept destroyed by incompetent leadership.

Maintaining a culture to support success through each stage of a company’s life cycle is not easy. Share on XOften, the people who helped you through startup, for example, are not viable as you move into rapid growth employing professional managers. Some people will be able to adapt to the challenge, but others won’t. How do you tell an employee that helped the brand achieve the initial success that they cannot go to the promised land? All you can do is make their separation as positive as possible, recognizing them for their contribution to the company.

Having completed a bit of research,  I found a rich bibliography for your consideration. Much of what I found describes how to build a culture of excellence.  I have provided links at the end of this article if you are interested in further reading.

Healthy cultures do not just happen.  It requires a concerted effort.  I have seen the powerful effect of a rigorous focus in this regard. Companies that build their cultures enjoy the benefits of sustained success, including a definite recruiting advantage.  If you believe you have a competitive product and an effective strategy, ensure success by focusing on your culture.  This effort will probably require the help of outside resources.  There are many firms to consider that will enrich your process with credibility and expertise.  Their experience will help you proceed at a quicker pace while avoiding common mistakes.  If you want to build a culture of excellence, I suggest you get started immediately and reach out to professionals for help and guidance.

https://www.hrexchangenetwork.com/hr-talent-management/articles/7-tips-for-creating-a-culture-of-excellence

https://medium.com/@andrewsenduk/how-to-build-a-culture-of-excellence-c9689b852d30

https://www.firedupculture.com/culture-of-excellence/

https://www.fingerprintforsuccess.com/blog/culture-of-excellence

https://www.bizjournals.com/bizjournals/how-to/growth-strategies/2014/04/3-key-steps-for-building-a-culture-of-excellence.html

Thank you for visiting our blog.

 

Jim Weber, Managing Partner – ITB Partners

Jim Weber – Managing Partner,  ITB Partners

I hope you enjoyed our point of view and would like to receive regular posts directly to your email inbox.  Toward this end, put your contact information on my mailing list.

Your feedback helps me continue to publish articles that you want to read.  Your input is very important to me so; please leave a comment.

 

 

 

 

 

Posted on

HR Experts Explain How to Combat a Bad Reputation with Employees

Phillip Davis

Human Resources (HR) is constantly stereotyped as the bad guy reporting to the company, and not in support of the workers. Dissimilar management teams view the role of HR very differently. The typical role carved out for HR ranges from administrative only to overseeing the employee lifecycle, outlining company policies, talent acquisition, payroll, and on up to strategic partner. This said employee interface is inherent in HR’s role.

As a strategic partner, HR provides input on what actions are taken that will impact employees, and how those actions are implemented. Both roles are important. The “what” needs to be a business decision. The “how” needs to be heavily weighted by HR best practices and in the best interests of all employees.

When HR plays an administrative only role, the only way for HR to ingratiate itself to employees is to emphasize empathy and caring in all that they do. The what and sometimes the how are given to HR to execute, so the only variable is the demeanor of the HR representative while performing their assigned duties.

Where the HR role has strategic content, the opportunity to impact employee perceptions of HR increases from just empathy and caring in the following ways:

    1. Ensuring that short- and long-term people factors are considered during the decision-making process. The solution must ultimately be driven by business factors; therefore, HR must be able to make its case for the “how” in full consideration of the “why” and “what”.
    1. Once the decision is made, HR’s role shifts to the “how”. Precedent from prior similar actions needs to be considered. If this review differs, HR needs to ensure that those differences are clearly articulated and communicated to employees effectively. No matter what the action, effective communications include written communications, team meetings, and most important of all, interactions with direct supervisors. Special consideration needs to be placed on ensuring that all supervisors are fully briefed on the “why” behind the actions being taken. The supervisor is the most important link in the communications chain, so their understanding and support are vital.
    1. HR works with leadership to establish the “people goals” of the action being taken. These goals need to be verbalized and reinforced as important outcomes of the actions being taken. These goals need to be measurable so at the end of the day, you can determine if the goal was achieved or not.
    1. HR oversees the operational decisions being made as it impacts employees. All legal considerations need to be factored into the actions taken, and all steps must be legally compliant.
    1. HR ensures that each individual employee affected is treated fairly with dignity and respect. To accomplish this task, HR needs to have relationships with employees throughout the organization, particularly with the influencers among the employee population. The influencers will know and can communicate to HR (directly or through their supervisors) any activities or individual behaviors that are not consistent with the employee relations goals established by management with the advice of HR.
    1. And finally, HR leads a post-mortem on the change actions to document lessons learned to ensure that future actions are informed by lessons learned from earlier actions.

Actions that negatively impact employees are never easy. But a strong HR team, grounded in strategy, can lessen the impact on the business and its employees. Where this is the case, the view of leadership and employees of HR can be dramatically improved.

Philip A. Davis
Senior Vice President
Flex HR

About FlexHR

Flex HR is an Administrative Services Organization (ASO) that provides leadership to deliver customized, scalable, and cost-effective HR outsourcing solutions. Flex HR offers a highly collaborative approach to consulting and outsourcing by aligning core human resources competencies needed to achieve the value expected from your company’s most important assets: your people.

Jim Cichanski | Founder & CHRO | Flex HR
JCichanski@FlexHR.com
404.966.0690

Thank you for visiting our blog.

 

Jim Weber, Managing Partner – ITB Partners

Jim Weber – Managing Partner,  ITB Partners

I hope you enjoyed our point of view and would like to receive regular posts directly to your email inbox.  Toward this end, put your contact information on my mailing list.

Your feedback helps me continue to publish articles that you want to read.  Your input is very important to me so; please leave a comment.