Five Reasons to Conduct Marketing Research

Large consumer companies like Coca-Cola, Proctor & Gamble, and Unilever spend millions of dollars each year on marketing research to gain an edge in a competitive market. They have large staffs of people with PhDs, MMRs, and MBAs creating and managing complex research studies to provide data and insights to support business decisions.

But what about small or medium-sized businesses? Are the insights leveraged by big companies beyond their scope because of a lack of resources and personnel? Should they depend on guesswork and intuition to drive marketing decisions? The answer is an emphatic NO!

Attaining insights to drive your business is within the reach of any business. The scope and scale may differ, but the focus should be on five key learnings.

    1. Know Your Company
    2. Know your Customers
    3. Know your Prospects
    4. Know your Competitors
    5. Know your Communications

Know Your Company

The first maxim inscribed in the forecourt of the Temple of Apollo at Delphi is “Know Thyself”.  Organizations of all sizes must develop detailed strategic plans that describe their mission, goals, and objectives and define key strengths and weaknesses. A foundational marketing research study will develop a greater understanding of the marketplace dynamics and consumers to identify your unique selling proposition and better target your organization’s goals and objectives to the needs and characteristics of the marketplace.

Know your Customers

Customer retention is critical to the success of any business. Current customers are easier to engage, cheaper to retain, more likely to spend more dollars with you, and can recommend your products and services to others. But, to retain customers, you first have to know and understand them. Marketing Research is critical to understanding how your current customers perceive and engage with your products and services. Customer experience and customer satisfaction studies conducted on a regular basis measure change in customer perceptions due to marketing programs and tactics deployed by your company and competitive activity.  Regular Awareness, Attitude, and Usage research can help you further understand the needs and wants of your customers and the characteristics of their lifestyle, media consumption, and demographics that you can leverage to better meet those needs and wants.

Know your Prospects

Like a shark that must swim forward to stay alive, a business organization must grow to survive. Marketing Research is necessary to learn about the differentiating characteristics of your non-customers and your prospects. Deploy research among prospective customers to measure attitudes and usage of your competitor brands as differentiated from your customers.  Additionally, a Market Segmentation study can be used to group prospects into homogenous segments that can be differentially targeted with specific marketing.

Know your Competitors

In his famous treatise, “Art of War”, Sun Tzu says, “If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles.” Having insights about your competitors can identify gaps in their product and service delivery to exploit in your tactical marketing. The starting point is to gain a relative measure of brand awareness for your company and that of your competitors. Interviews with your competitors’ customers can identify competitive brand positionings relative to your own and their strengths and weaknesses. Ultimately, your analysis should “map” or compare your brands’ strengths and position versus those of your competitors.

Know your Communication

George Bernard Shaw is quoted, “The single biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place.” In a world overrun with messaging, how do you get your messages to stand out? Marketing Research is the vehicle to provide feedback about how successful your marketing campaigns are in building awareness and supporting your brand positioning.  Attitudinal information will also help guide the development and structure of your advertising and promotional messaging to effectively break through the clutter, clearly communicate, and support the positioning and unique selling proposition of your products and services.

Therefore, don’t avoid conducting marketing research because you feel that it is out of reach due to cost, complexity, or relevancy.  You need to know your company, your customers, your prospects, your competition, and your communication to be successful and thrive in the marketplace. Marketing research can provide you with the answers you need.

 

Carl Fusco

Carl Fusco is an accomplished Marketing Research Consultant who helps businesses more effectively solve problems by applying research techniques and data-based insights.  For more information, reach out to Carl at fuscoresearch@gmail.com

 

 

 

Thank you for visiting our blog.

 

Jim Weber, Managing Partner – ITB Partners

Jim Weber – Managing Partner,  ITB Partners

I hope you enjoyed our point of view and would like to receive regular posts directly to your email inbox.  Toward this end, put your contact information on my mailing list.

Your feedback helps me continue to publish articles that you want to read.  Your input is very important to me, so please leave a comment.

Avoiding New Product Failure – Five Caveats for New Product Development Research

Industry leaders continually invest in refining and evolving their current product/service assortment through new product development. They do this to remain competitive as well as to generate measurable new top-line revenue for their organizations. Yet, the failure rate for new product introductions remains frighteningly high. Ask anyone what percentage of new products fail. The usual answer is somewhere between 70-90 percent.

Market Research can help reduce the failure rate considerably when applied relevantly and conducted correctly. But, there are five pitfalls that need to be avoided;

 

 

 

 

 

  1. Test What You Intend to Launch

The features, benefits, and attributes that you use to describe and evaluate the product in research MUST match the product that you will bring to the market as closely as possible. Testing attributes that aren’t possible or too expensive may lead to unrealistic demand forecasts. For example, in testing a new online video game service, the research described the product as including hundreds of games from the top game publishers and a seamless interface and game-playing experience. Target consumer response to this concept was highly positive. However, when it was time to launch the product, many of the top game publishers were not included and the product required advanced drivers and high-powered PCs with very large RAM capacity to perform optimally. As a result, consumer expectations were never reached, and the product ultimately failed.

  1. Don’t Depend on Qualitative Research Alone

Qualitative Research (focus groups, depth interviews, ethnography) utilize small, non-projectable samples. Qualitative research is very effective in providing guidance, hypotheses development, and disaster prevention. However, because the samples are small and not representative of the entire target market, the detailed findings developed solely on the insights from qualitative research may be wildly different from the reality of the marketplace. Always follow up with quantitative, projectable research to confirm hypotheses!

  1. Respondents Will Often Overstate Their Intentions

Overstatement of intent bias is always an issue when measuring constructs such as “likelihood to buy” or “overall interest”. Respondents just can’t predict exactly what they intend to buy, especially if it’s a highly innovative product. There are a few ways to handle overstatement. First, when using scales, it helps that all of the data points are labeled or anchored so that there is no ambiguity of how to answer the question.  Second, you may also want to consider using a down weighting scheme using historical empirical data to verify actual product take rates to survey results.Or, third, you may consider a hybrid approach, and instead of directly asking people for their own likelihood to buy, you ask them to project their forecast of what others would likely buy. In this way, you can overcome their personal… Click To TweetBut one of the best ways to overcome overstatement is to measure the likelihood to buy using a trade-off technique such as Discrete Choice or Conjoint Testing or MaxDiff. These techniques “force” respondents to make trade-offs and distinct choices of one product over the other, thus mitigating bias of direct questioning.

  1. Evaluate Features, Benefits, and Attributes of the New Product In Bundles, Rather Than In Isolation

The most famous case illustrating this caveat is the Edsel. When developing the Ford Edsel, researchers tested various components of the car in isolation. They identified the preferred bumper, the preferred grill, the preferred dashboard configuration, and so on. When all the research was completed, they combined the top tested components together. But the car that resulted did not look or operate optimally. Utilizing one or more trade-off testing approaches such as Discrete Choice, Conjoint, or Max-Diff mentioned above will help to avoid this problem.

5.Remain Objective! You May Have to Declare that the “Baby” Is Ugly.

As a researcher, it is your duty to remain objective, to base conclusions and insights only on the data. The person or team developing the new project has a special interest in the success of the new product. But, for the good of the organization, if the research identifies flaws or inconsistencies, or simply disinterest, then it is important to clearly communicate this to the product team so that either adjustment can be made to improve the product or that the launch can be canceled. I once conducted a pricing test for a new product that indicated that the target price that consumers were willing to pay was about $100. However, the cost to make and sell the product was about $200. Unfortunately, despite the obvious discrepancy, the client decided to launch the product at a price of $285. Suffice it to say, the product was a flop. So, not only do you need to tell the client bad news, they need to believe you and act accordingly.

Following these guidelines will greatly increase your odds of success. But remember, ask the right questions, of the right people, at the right time.

 

Carl Fusco

Carl Fusco is an accomplished Marketing Research Consultant who helps businesses more effectively solve problems by applying research techniques and data-based insights.  For more information email him at carl_fusco@yahoo.com or phone him at 770-364-7160.

 

 

Thank you for visiting our Blog!

Jim Weber – Managing Partner,  ITB Partners

Jim Weber – Managing Partner, ITB Partners

I hope you enjoyed our point of view and would like to receive regular posts directly to your email inbox.  Toward this end, put your contact information on my mailing list.

Your feedback helps me continue to publish articles that you want to read.  Your input is very important to me so; please leave a comment.

 

 

Can I Afford NOT to Research? The Tale of Art and Bart

Art and Bart were college buddies at the University of Georgia (Go Dawgs!). They both graduated from the school of Landscape Architecture and went on to work at various companies to gain experience and knowledge. In 2014, they each embarked on opening their own Landscaping business, Art on the Northside of Atlanta and Bart on the Southside of Atlanta. Each started slowly, but by the end of 2018, through hard work and talent, they had each established very successful businesses with the following financials at the end of 2018:

 

  ART’S LANDSCAPING BART’S LANDSCAPING
Revenue 2018 $4,800,000 $4,800,000
Number of customers 2018 500 500
Revenue per customer /month $800 $800
net adds / churn per month* 0.5% 0.5%

At the beginning of 2019, a large landscaping company, Grass R Us, established 4 new franchises in the Atlanta area with a heavy advertising campaign and an initial price offering 10% lower than Art and Bart. This resulted in a change of net adds/churn to -2.75% per month. Through the end of June, Art and Bart had each lost about 75 customers and over $60,000.

Art felt confident that he knew his business and knew the market. He had anecdotal information from some of his crew that the lower prices offered by Grass R Us was the issue. So, as of July 1, Art lowered his prices across the board by 10%. This did have an immediate effect of decreasing net adds/churn to -1.5% per month. The overall result for Art’s business at the end of the year was a loss of about 114 customers and over $90,000. He wasn’t happy about the outcome, but by swiftly lowering his prices, Art believed he had averted a much larger hit on his business.

On the other side of town, Bart was faced with the same issue. But Bart remembered another old friend from UGA, Suzanne, who was in the Master of Marketing Research (MMR) Program. Suzanne was now working for a small research agency in Atlanta. Bart called Suzanne and asked her if she could help him with his problem. Suzanne designed a marketing research study for Bart to identify the core issues causing his customers to move to Grass R Us. Although the cost of the research was $30,000 and would take 6 weeks to complete, Bart felt that having good information would help him make a better decision.

The research was executed by Suzanne’s company, and the results indicated that the most important issue was NOT cost. Bart’s customers were satisfied with Bart’s service and pricing but were drawn to Grass R Us by fancy marketing and a highly promoted 100% guarantee. Bart decided, that, unlike his friend Art, he would not lower prices, but started to promote his own written 100% guarantee in September.  Not only did the loss of customers stop, but net adds soared to +4.0% per month! By the end of the year, Bart had lost only about 32 customers and just over $25,000. Including the cost of the marketing research, Bart lost about $15,000 less than his buddy Art!

Projecting out to the next year, if everything remains equal, Art will continue to lose customers at a rate of about 5 per month and will lose an additional $50,000+. Bart, on the other hand, will gain about 20 customers per month and increase revenues over the year by over $200,000!

Although this is a hypothetical example, we are left with two important lessons. First, the cost of doing marketing research is justified by the savings in cost or increases in revenue experienced through better, data-based decisions.  And second, whenever possible, hire a graduate of the UGA MMR program to lead your marketing research!

Carl Fusco

Carl Fusco is an accomplished Marketing Research Consultant who helps businesses more effectively solve problems by applying research techniques and data-based insights.  For more information, email him at carl_fusco@yahoo.com or call him at 770-364-7160.

 

 

Thank you for visiting our Blog!

Jim Weber – Managing Partner,  ITB Partners

Jim Weber – Managing Partner, ITB Partners

I hope you enjoyed our point of view and would like to receive regular posts directly to your email inbox.  Toward this end, put your contact information on my mailing list.

Your feedback helps me continue to publish articles that you want to read.  Your input is very important to me so; please leave a comment.

How I Became a Marketing Researcher (and Loved It)

If you asked a group of Kindergarteners what they wanted to be when they grow up, you’ll get a lot of answers like Doctor or Firefighter or Teacher or Athlete, but I would wager that no little boy or girl would say, “I want to be a marketing researcher”.  Even if you asked a group of High School students, I don’t think a single one would state that their ambition was to become a marketing research professional.  So, how do people wind up as researchers?  Well, for most, it’s a combination of fate and opportunity, and the path is rarely straight.

When I was a little boy, obsessed with dinosaurs, I wanted to be an Archeologist.  By the time I got to High School, growing up with the space program and watching men land on the moon, I thought I wanted to be an Aerospace Engineer.  Taking Physics in High School made me realize that I didn’t really want to be an Aerospace Engineer.  So, instead of going to an Engineering School, I enrolled at Oneonta (NY) State and selected Statistics as my major. So, how did I wind up as a marketing research professional?   Basically, I can attribute the beginnings to two Professors at Oneonta (NY) State College.

Dr. Esmat Nouri, the Head of the Statistics Department at Oneonta and my academic advisor was the first major influence on my chosen profession.  Dr. Nouri was a brilliant statistician and excellent teacher (though because of his thick Egyptian accent he had difficulty pronouncing the word “statistics”). He was laid-back, easy to talk to, and he really cared about his students. At the beginning of my Junior year, it was about time that I started to think about what kind of career I could expect when I graduated with a BS in Statistics, and I set up a meeting with Dr. Nouri. During the meeting, Dr. Nouri told me that most Statistics graduates entered the field of actuarial sciences. He explained in detail the type of work that Actuaries did, the series of exams that they needed to pass, the good earnings potential, and the stability of the career path.

Let me state emphatically that I have a tremendous amount of respect for the men and women who work in the actuarial profession, and I understand that it is an excellent, important, and lucrative career. But, at the time, my 20-year-old brain could not fathom a more boring thing to do for the rest of my professional life. I left the meeting depressed and anxious. Did I need to change majors? Would it delay my graduation?  Is my life ruined? (Yes, I could be very dramatic back then.)

Enter, the second person to influence my career at this early stage.  I had picked up an Intro to Marketing course as an elective in my Junior year taught by George H. Webster. Mr. Webster was energetic, enthusiastic, and smart.  His teaching style made Marketing fun and interesting. During one lecture, soon after my depressing meeting with Dr. Nouri, the topic of marketing research was discussed. Wow! A light bulb lit up. There was the answer. Combining the rigor and logic of statistics with the excitement and creativity of marketing was the answer to my problem. I now had a goal. Click To Tweet

Well, I graduated with my degree in Statistics and took enough business courses to earn a minor in Business Economics.

I took a year to figure things out. Then, I returned to academia and pursued an MBA in Marketing at SUNY Albany.  Upon graduation from Albany, while most of my classmates were getting jobs in New York City, I decided to move to Atlanta. Although Atlanta was then a growing city, it was not a hotbed for marketing research and my degrees from Albany and Oneonta did not impress any potential employers in the South.

Through a stroke in fate, my father saw a job posting in the Wall Street Journal for Lecturer positions at my alma mater, Oneonta State. He encouraged me to apply, even though I had no interest in teaching nor felt that I had the experience or academic qualifications for the job. But, to please my father, I went ahead and applied, not believing that I had a shot.

To my surprise, I got the job and joined the faculty at Oneonta State. I enjoyed three years teaching Accounting, Intro to Business, and Marketing and, finally, in Year 3, I got to teach a course in Marketing Research. But in the back of my mind, I still had that goal of becoming a professional marketing researcher.

While teaching at Oneonta, I got a flyer in the mail from the University of Georgia promoting a new academic program leading to a Masters in Marketing Research (MMR). As a member of the business faculty, I was supposed to talk to my students about the program and encourage applications. Not only did I share the information with my students, but I decided to apply for the program myself, was accepted and enrolled.

After completing my MMR, I finally had the marketing research credentials to combine with my Statistics degree and Marketing MBA to reach my goal and I landed my first professional marketing research job in Atlanta.

So, my path wasn’t direct, but I eventually found my way. My career has had its up and downs and twists and turns, but I have worked in the marketing research profession now for more than 35 years!

I’ve got Dr. Nouri to thank for being forthright and honest with me about what careers to expect with an undergraduate degree in statistics, highlighting what I didn’t want to do. Unfortunately, Dr. Nouri passed away in 2003 and I never got the chance to thank him for his influence. I am appreciative of George H. Webster for sparking my interest in Marketing with his enthusiasm and expertise for the subject, helping me to discover what I did want to do.  I don’t know what has happened to Mr. Webster, but if he’s out there and reading this… Thanks!

How about you? What was your professional path? Was it full of twists and turns? Who were the people who helped put you on the right road? What’s your story?  I’d love to hear about it.

Carl Fusco

Carl Fusco is an accomplished Marketing Research Consultant who helps businesses more effectively solve problems by applying research techniques and data-based insights.  For more information, email him at carl_fusco@yahoo.com or call him at 770-364-7160 .

 

 

Thank you for visiting our Blog!

Jim Weber – Managing Partner,  ITB Partners

Jim Weber – Managing Partner, ITB Partners

I hope you enjoyed our point of view and would like to receive regular posts directly to your email inbox.  Toward this end, put your contact information on my mailing list.

Your feedback helps me continue to publish articles that you want to read.  Your input is very important to me so; please leave a comment.

Five Things to Learn from Marketing Research

 Large consumer companies like Coca-Cola, Proctor & Gamble, and Frito-Lay spend millions of dollars each year on marketing research to gain an edge in a competitive market. They have a large staff of people with PhDs, MMRs, and MBAs creating and managing complex research studies to provide data and insights to support business decisions.

But what about smaller or medium-sized businesses? Are the insights leveraged by big companies beyond their scope because of a lack of resources and personnel? Should they depend on guesswork and intuition to drive marketing decisions? The answer is NO.

Attaining insights to drive your business is within the reach of any business. The scope and scale may differ, but the focus should be on five key learnings.

    1. Know Your Company
    2. Know Your Customers
    3. Know Your Prospects
    4. Know Your Competitors
    5. Know Your Communications

A good starting point to addressing all of these is an Awareness, Attitude, and Usage (AAU) study. A comprehensive AAU study provides the necessary component measures to understand and define your place in the marketplace and how you are perceived by consumers and prospects. The study can be scaled to fit the needs of the organization based on the size of the market, the number of competitors, and the extent of your budget.

Awareness (the percentage of the target population who are aware of your brand vs. other brands) helps marketers understand their position in the marketplace and the success of their marketing communications programs. Awareness is measured in three components:

    • Top-of-mind awareness- the percentage of people who mention a brand as the first one that comes to mind.
    • Unaided awareness- the percentage of mentions of brands that people recall beyond top-of-mind without any prompting.
    • Aided awareness-the percentage of mentions after providing a list of brand names from which to choose.

Attitude measures provide insights about the reputation of your brand and competing brands in the mind of consumers, leading to the development of your brand positioning. Attitude is usually measured using a series of statements about brand attributes that respondents rate on how well those attributes fit with or describe the relevant brand.

The final part of AAU, Usage, is directly linked with sales and provides insights into the number, frequency, and timing of purchasing combined with the consumer’s behavior and thought process while purchasing the product.

A well-constructed AAU should also include psychographics, lifestyle, and demographic questions that can be used to categorize and segment consumers in the marketplace. Here is how an AAU can provide insights to the five questions:

Know Your Company

Organizations of all sizes must develop detailed strategic plans that describe their mission, goals, and objectives and define key strengths and weaknesses. Through the AAU study, you will develop a greater understanding of the marketplace dynamics and consumers to identify your unique selling proposition and better target your organizations’ goals and objectives to the needs and characteristics of the marketplace.

Know Your Customers

Beyond understanding how consumers perceive your products and services, the AAU study can help you further understand the needs and wants of your customers and characteristics about their lifestyle, media consumption, and demographics that you can leverage to better meet those needs and wan

 Know Your Prospects

 Like a shark that must swim forward to stay alive, a business organization must grow to survive. Marketing Research is necessary to learn about the differentiating characteristics of your non-customers, your prospects. Deploy the AAU study among prospective customers to measure their attitudes and usage of your and competitor brands as differentiated from your customers.  Additionally, the data can be used to identify prospects in homogenous groups or segments that can be differentially targeted with specific marketing programs to gain their adoption of your products or services.

Know Your Competitors

Having insights about your competitors can identify gaps in their delivery of consumer needs and wants to exploit in your tactical marketing. Of course, the AAU will provide a relative measure of brand awareness for your company and that of your competitors. The AAU should also include interviews with customers of your competitors to measure their attitudes and to understand competitive brand positionings. Ultimately, your analysis should “map” or compare your brands’ strengths and position versus those of your competitors.

 Know Your Communication

In a world overrun with messaging, how do you get your messages to stand out? The AAU will provide information about how successful your marketing campaigns are in building awareness and supporting your brand positioning. The attitudinal information will also help guide the development and structure of your advertising and promotional messaging to effectively break through the clutter, clearly communicate, and support the positioning and unique selling proposition of your products and services.

Don’t avoid conducting marketing research because you feel that it is out of reach due to cost, complexity, or relevancy. Click To TweetYou need to know Your Company, your customers, your prospects, your competition, and your communication to be successful. AAU marketing research can provide you with those answers.

For more on this and other Marketing Research topics, follow me on LinkedIn or reach out to me at carl_fusco@yahoo.com if I can help you in any way.

 

Carl Fusco

Carl Fusco is an accomplished Marketing Research Consultant who helps businesses more effectively solve problems by applying research techniques and data-based insights.

 

 

 

 

Thank you for visiting our Blog!

Jim Weber – Managing Partner,  ITB Partners

Jim Weber – Managing Partner, ITB Partners

I hope you enjoyed our point of view and would like to receive regular posts directly to your email inbox.  Toward this end, put your contact information on my mailing list.

Your feedback helps me continue to publish articles that you want to read.  Your input is very important to me so; please leave a comment.

Marketing Research is Simple… Asking at the “Right” Time

In my previous articles, I illustrated that to conduct “good” Marketing Research, you must Ask the “Right” Questions, of the “Right” People.  In this final installment in the series, I explore Asking at the “Right” Time.

Timing research correctly should be obvious.  Determine when you need the information to make a decision, how long the research will take, and count back on the calendar to determine when you need to start. But, as with asking the “Right” questions of the “Right” people, it is not always that simple. There are five questions to consider relative to timing when planning research:

  1. Is there enough time to conduct the research? Sometimes you just don’t have the time you need to conduct the research that is necessary.  Early in my career, a product manager asked me to provide a proposal to research a new product innovation that was under development. It was the end of March. I was excited by the chance to build a comprehensive research program to assess the feasibility of a product, not only new to the company but a true innovation in the industry.  I wrote a proposal that included secondary research, qualitative research, and a number of step-wise quantitative studies, all culminating in an estimate of demand for the new product.  The whole program would take 12-15 months, which I felt was pretty efficient considering the scope.  But the product manager rejected my plan, not because of the expense, but because of the timing.  You see, the product under development was already scheduled to be launched on November 2 of that same year.  The launch was on a published schedule at a major industry conference and the company CEO was already slated to make the announcement.  So, there was no time to execute any research to support the development and launch of the product.
  1. Are you blessed with too much time? I once rushed a research project into the field at the end of the year to make sure that we used up the money that was in our budget. It was a prudent thing to do from a budgetary standpoint, but it wasn’t effective for the business.  I presented the results of the research in January of the following year, only to find that the insights were no longer relevant because the entire marketing program upon which the research was predicated was to be radically changed in the next month.
  1. Do you need to have measurements before and after an event or campaign?  If you are conducting a Pre-Post study, you must be sure that the Pre phase of the research is completed before the event that you want to measure in the Post phase begins. If you are measuring the effectiveness of an advertising campaign, the Pre phase must be completed before the ad campaign is launched.  Sometimes, it’s impossible to conduct a Pre phase.  For example, last April, I was asked if we could compare attitudes of people about healthcare before the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic.  At the time, without a 1985 DeLorean equipped with a Flux Capacitor, it was impossible to conduct a Pre COVID-19 survey.
  1. Can your timing be interrupted by external forces? I was managing a packaging test for a brand of fruit juices utilizing personal interviews in three cities.  We had a tight timeline to finish the research to provide input to the manufacturer to coincide with the completion of the packaging production facility.  Everything was right on schedule until the interviewing facility outside of Los Angeles had to evacuate due to out-of-control wildfires.  Fortunately, no one was hurt, but external forces beyond our control delayed our project by a full week.
  1. Is this a good time to be conducting any research? There may not be a “Right” time to conduct a research project and perhaps the best decision is to delay or not do any research.  For example, you shouldn’t be testing a new technology before you have a working prototype. I once tried to test a new smartphone concept in focus groups when we only had a wooden model to show respondents.  They could not understand the concept at all.  Delaying the research until we could better demonstrate the product led to more useful insights.

Timing is a critical component of any research program.  By asking these five questions as part of your research planning, you can avoid making errors and wasting resources.

For more on this and other Marketing Research topics, follow me on LinkedIn or reach out to me at carl_fusco@yahoo.com if I can help you in any way.

Carl Fusco

Carl Fusco is an accomplished Marketing Research Consultant who helps businesses more effectively solve problems by applying research techniques and data-based insights.

 

Thank you for visiting our Blog!

Jim Weber, Managing Partner – ITB Partners

Jim Weber – Managing Partner,  ITB Partners

I hope you enjoyed our point of view and would like to receive regular posts directly to your email inbox.  Toward this end, put your contact information on my mailing list.

Your feedback helps me continue to publish articles that you want to read.  Your input is very important to me so; please leave a comment.

 

Asking the “Right” People

Marketing Research is Simple…

Asking the “Right” People

In my last article, as part of my series on conducting “good” Marketing Research, I discussed the importance of asking the “Right” Questions, and some of the perils of not doing so.

In this article, I’m going to delve more deeply into the importance of choosing the “Right” people to include in your survey.

Since it is usually impossible (or impractical) to survey ALL of the people in a population, the critical issue in selecting the “Right” people is the sample design.  When designing a sample for research, it is critical to watch for and avoid 5 types of errors.

  1. Sampling Error – Sampling error is unavoidable. Whenever you take a sample of observations from a population to estimate that population, you will grapple with sampling error. The sample is never exactly the same as the entire population.  However, the good news is that statistical theory provides a method to estimate and minimize the degree of sampling error.

Sampling error is affected primarily by the size of the sample drawn from the population.  The larger the sample, the lower the sampling error. Designing an effective sample for a study is balancing the size of the sample with the budget you have for the study.

For example, a random sample of 400 from a large population will yield an estimated sampling error of +/- 4.8% at the 5% level of confidence.  This means that you can be 95% sure that the data you generate from your survey will be within +/-4.8% of the population parameter.  Of course, a sample of 500 would reduce the sampling error to +/-4.3%. Conversely, a sample of 300 would be less costly but would increase the sampling error to +/-5.6%. Considering sample error only, the sample size decision is based on your budget and your tolerance for error.  Does a 0.5% reduction in sampling error justify the additional cost for a sample of 500?  Can you accept a 0.8% increase in sampling error with a less costly sample of 300?

You also need to account for any sub-groups that you wish to analyze in your sample. A total sample size of 400 may be adequate for total sample analysis, but if you want to compare results by particular market segments, you may need to increase the total sample size to provide enough observations by segment.

The other four errors are referred to as Non-Sampling Errors.  Unfortunately, these errors cannot be measured statistically, but they can be mitigated through careful sample design and selection.

  1. Population Specification Error occurs when the population from which the sample is to be drawn does not match the objectives of the study. For example, I once managed a project to identify the key factors driving the purchase decision of a type of industrial equipment.  We interviewed a sample of Purchasing Managers from our target industries who were thought to be the decision-makers for this category.  But when we completed the study, the results were inconclusive.  Price emerged as the only attribute that was perceived to be important.  Further investigation revealed that while the final purchase decision was indeed made by a Purchasing Manager, it was the Plant Engineer who determined the specifications and vendors.  The Purchasing Managers only negotiated prices and contract terms and executed the transaction.  Repeating the study among Plant Engineers, the more relevant population, identified the key technical specifications that were driving the purchase decision.
  1. Sample Frame Error is similar to Population Specification Error. However, instead of choosing the wrong population, you choose the wrong subgroup or groups from within the population.  This error is commonly encountered when a survey is conducted without any quota controls.  For example, very often women are more willing to answer consumer surveys than men.  Without any controls, your data may be improperly skewed toward women.   Setting a minimum quota for men in you sample plan can limit this error.  Likewise,  if a key constituency of your research is the Latino segment and your survey is programmed only in English, you will likely under-represent the Latino segment.
  1. Self-Selection Error occurs because you can’t force people to answer your surveys; people have the option to respond or not.  The results may become biased if those who do select to respond differ substantively from those who do not.  This happens a lot in customer satisfaction surveys.  People who tend to be dissatisfied are more likely to respond to such a survey to voice their complaints about poor service, introducing a negative bias to your results.
  1. Non-Response Error occurs when there is a practical difference between people who respond and those who fail to respond to your survey. For example, if you are conducting a political poll and the members of one party generally refuse to participate in the survey, your results will be skewed to the opinions of only one party.

Self-selection and Non-response errors are extremely common in almost every type of marketing research.  You can’t measure these errors and therefore don’t know the impact on the data you collect.  There are ways that you can reduce the impact of these errors by encouraging a higher, more random participation rate by:

    • Offering incentives (cash, coupons, prize drawings, information) for completed interviews
    • Utilization of respondent panels made up of people who opt-in to surveys
    • Short, simple, neat, and clean survey design that encourages participation
    • A distinct and credible promise of confidentiality and anonymity
    • A clear description of the purpose of the survey and assurance that it is not a sales pitch
    • Follow-up with reminder invitations to non-responders

In summary, to interview the “Right” people:

    • Keep focused on the objectives of the research!
    • Make sure that you clearly know the identity of your target respondent
    • Optimize the size of your sample within your budget to minimize sampling error
    • Clearly identify the Population and Subgroups that define your target respondent
    • Mitigate self-selection and non-response biases by providing incentives, using opt-in panels, good survey planning, and survey design, assuring confidentiality and anonymity, clearly describing your purpose, and sending reminders

Look for the final installment in this series, Asking at the “Right” Time, next week.

For more on this and other Marketing Research topics, follow me on LinkedIn or reach out to me at carl_fusco@yahoo.com if I can help you in any way.

Carl Fusco

Carl Fusco is an accomplished Marketing Research Consultant who helps businesses more effectively solve problems by applying research techniques and data-based insights.

 

 

 

Thank you for visiting our Blog!

Jim Weber, Managing Partner – ITB Partners

Jim Weber – Managing Partner,  ITB Partners

I hope you enjoyed our point of view and would like to receive regular posts directly to your email inbox.  Toward this end, put your contact information on my mailing list.

Your feedback helps me continue to publish articles that you want to read.  Your input is very important to me so; please leave a comment.

 

Reifschneider Completes PE Firm Engagement

Reifschneider Completes PE Firm Engagement

Doug Reifschneider

Doug Reifschneider, Member of ITB Partners, and Chief Marketing Officer (CMO) at Chief Outsiders, recently completed an extensive PE firm engagement.  The PE firm’s project was compressed into 45 days, and because of the need for speed, Reifschneider partnered with a colleague from Chief Outsiders to complete the project on time. The PE firm employed the two CMOs to develop a 100-day plan for a household services firm they plan to acquire.

The pair from Chief Outsiders complimented each other because the project included:

    • Digital Marketing Assessment
      • Digital SWOT
      • Scorecard for the website, digital marketing, and social media
      • recommendations
    • Gathering insights about the customers, competitors, and company
    • Develop a growth strategy
      • Activated SWOT analysis
      • Brand positioning workshop
      • Brand house exercise
      • From here to there exercise
    • Developed a marketing plan for the balance of 2021, including 14 “Game-changing” ideas
    • Prepare a go-to-market plan if invited to continue work with the new portfolio company

About Doug Reifsc hneider

Doug Reifschneider
Doug Reifschneider

Doug Reifschneider is a dynamic marketing leader with 30+ years of experience in the restaurant industry. He has a history of driving growth through the creation and delivery of unique, creative brand strategies enhancing customer affinity and market position. While at Firehouse Subs, Mr. Reifschneider helped achieve a 4X increase in locations, to 1,030 restaurants generating $684M in revenues and 19.4% average annual sales.

During his foodservice career, he navigated the ever-changing marketing/advertising environment. The advertising menu proliferated from a relatively short list of tactics (TV, radio, print [direct mail, magazines, newspaper, etc. ], OOH, POP, and direct selling) 20 years ago to thousands of online options which included but was not limited to display, native, SEO, SEM/PPC, web sites, landing pages, mobile and others. Doug has experience with all of it and is always looking for new technologies to exploit such as Blockchain.

Throughout his career, he consistently strengthened brand equity, grew the customer base, and boosted revenues through the development of innovative marketing campaigns.

Contact Doug at reif78@gmail.com

Ask the Right Questions!

Marketing Research is Simple…

Asking the “Right” Questions

Ask the Right Questions

In my previous blog, I reviewed the three steps necessary to conduct “good” Marketing Research:

      • Ask the “Right” Questions,
      • Ask the “Right” People,
      • Ask at the “Right” Time

However, simple these steps may seem, getting all the steps “Right” is a challenge.  In this blog, I’m going to probe more deeply into the topic of asking the “Right” questions.

Over the course of my career, I’ve seen numerous badly worded questions and poorly constructed questionnaires (yes, I’ve written many myself).  There are three basic ways to fail in asking the “Right” questions:

    • Asking the “Wrong” questions
    • Failing to ask all the “Right” questions
    • Asking the “Right” questions in the “Wrong” way

First, to avoid asking the “Wrong” questions, it is important to keep a laser focus on the objectives of the research. Losing sight of your objectives can cause you to stray off into topics and issues that are not relevant.  This is especially true when there are many levels of people providing input to the questionnaire design.  One solution is to design a mock report or outline before you start writing the questionnaire.  Knowing the key components of the report will define the information that you need to include in the questionnaire.

A more insidious problem is when you “think” that you are asking the “Right” questions, but you wind up leaving some key questions out.  A classic example is the case of New Coke.  Coca-Cola introduced a new formulation of its flagship brand in 1985.  Extensive marketing research had shown decisively in blind taste tests that the taste of the new formulation was preferred over the current Coke formulation and over Pepsi. The Coke marketing team thought they had a winner, and the new formulation was launched with heavy advertising and public relations. But, soon after the launch, the company began receiving letters and telephone calls from people all over the country expressing anger and disappointment about the “new” Coke. What happened? One issue was that in the marketing research, consumers were asked blindly whether they liked the taste of the new formulation relative to Coke and Pepsi.  They were not asked, either directly or indirectly, whether they would be in favor of replacing the Coke brand with a new formulation.  Loyal Coke drinkers couldn’t accept that their beloved Coke brand had been changed.  Aside from taste, there were strong emotional connections that people had with the brand that were not fully considered in the research.  They neglected to ask all the “Right” questions, such as “how would you feel if this new formulation replaced the current Coke formulation?”.  Perhaps the negative consumer reaction may have been predicted or mitigated if they had these insights developed from the research.

Finally, to avoid asking questions in the “Wrong” way, there are 6 errors to avoid:

    1. Leading or Loaded questions:

Perhaps the most common way to bias a question is to lead the respondent toward an answer that you’d like them to make.  For example, if you wish to get positive answers to a satisfaction question, you could ask “How excellent is the customer service you receive?”.  An unbiased alternative is “Please rate your level of satisfaction with the customer service you receive.”.

    1. Loaded questions:

Loaded questions are similar to leading questions in that they subtly (or not so subtly) push the user toward a particular response. Here you are making an assumption about the respondent that is included implicitly in the question. An example is, “What do you love about shopping online?” This presumes that a person loves shopping online and will bias their response.

    1. Unbalanced scales:

One way to lead questions is by using an answer scale that is unbalanced.  Asking, “please rate your satisfaction with the service on your last transaction” is unbiased.  But, you can bias the answers with an unbalanced scale, that provides more positive than negative choices, such as:

Extremely Satisfied Very Satisfied Somewhat Satisfied Satisfied Dissatisfied

 

    1. Double-barreled questions:

Double-barreled questions attempt to ask about two constructs in the same question. “Please rate your satisfaction with the courtesy and competence of your customer service rep”.  The customer service rep may be perceived as very courteous, but not very competent.  Or vice versa. Therefore, the answer to a double-barreled question is not clear. To solve the issue, you need to break the two constructs into separate questions.

    1. Unclear questions:

Questions that are too long, grammatically incorrect, using acronyms or jargon, or written above the heads of the target respondent will either be skipped or answered invalidly.  Keeping the reading level slightly below what you think is the average reading level of your target respondent.

    1. Unanswerable questions:

You can get skewed results to survey questions when you are asking something that the respondent can’t easily answer.  Perhaps it is information that is obscure, that they would have to look up, that happened too long ago, or that is just unknowable.  An example is, “Please tell me how much you paid for Title Insurance when you purchased your first home?”  Unless a respondent closed on their first home very recently or has easy access to their records, you are probably going to get inaccurate answers to this question.

In summary, to assure that you are asking the “Right” questions:

    • Keep focused on the objectives of the research. If a question doesn’t contribute to answering the key questions in the objectives, eliminate it.
    • Are there questions that you are missing? Look at your report outline.  Do you have all the key information covered?
    • Be aware of and avoid the common question bias pitfalls.
    • Have a colleague read the questionnaire over and make sure they understand it and it is free of spelling and grammatical errors.

The time you spend upfront to get the questions “Right” will save you the embarrassment of having to explain why you don’t have the insights that were expected.

Look for my next article next week that will probe more deeply into how to “Ask” questions of the “Right” people.

 

Carl Fusco

Carl Fusco is a Marketing Research and Consulting Executive skilled at directing the application of research techniques and insights to solve problems and support data-based business decisions. Over his 35-year career, Carl has built a reputation for quality, integrity, and creativity by establishing trust, credibility, and acceptance with clients and associates. He has built a proven track record of success in organizational management and leadership, research design and implementation, and analytic rigor and impact.

Contact Carl at:

carl_fusco@yahoo.com

770-364-7160

Thank you for visiting our Blog!

Jim Weber, Managing Partner – ITB Partners

Jim Weber – Managing Partner,  ITB Partners

I hope you enjoyed our point of view and would like to receive regular posts directly to your email inbox.  Toward this end, put your contact information on my mailing list.

Your feedback helps me continue to publish articles that you want to read.  Your input is very important to me so; please leave a comment.

 

Marketing Research is Simple… But Not Easy!

Marketing Research is Not Easy!

Figure 1Marketing Research is Simple…

As a marketing researcher for over 30 years, I would like to think that I’ve learned a few things.  So, I am going to dedicate my blogs to areas where I’ve had the benefit of experience, to share some of that experience with you.

For the first blog in the series, I thought I would write about a basic conundrum of the marketing research profession: what constitutes “good” marketing research.

First, what is the purpose of Marketing Research? The purpose can be summed up as gathering data and information from the marketplace, from consumers and/or customers about a problem or an issue facing an organization that provides insights to help make better decisions.

To accomplish this, you only need to do 3 things:

    • Ask the “Right” Questions…
    • Of the “Right” People…
    • At the “Right” Time.

Simple, right?

Well, perhaps simple, but not easy.

As my colleagues understand, meeting each of these three criteria can be a difficult challenge. Especially, in today’s high-tech, rapidly moving, “need-an-answer-now” environment, everyone is looking for shortcuts.  Many businesspeople believe marketing research is so easy that just about anyone can do it.  They believe that all you need is to:

    • Ask Questions…
    • Of People…
    • Whenever.

The keyword missing in the above shortcut scenario is “RIGHT”; meaning correct, relevant, valid, and effective.

Additionally, all three components must be present and work together, to result in effective research.  You cannot ask the “Right” questions of the “Wrong” people or ask the “Wrong” questions of the “Right” people and expect the get actionable insights to make better decisions.  And if the timing isn’t “Right”, if you are not able to provide the insights when they are needed, then your research is worthless.

Let’s take a simple hypothetical case.  Assume that your company provides a consumer service, and the company is experiencing a high degree of churn, i.e., customers dropping your service for the competition.  The “Right” questions would include measures such as overall satisfaction, satisfaction with key attributes, likelihood to renew a subscription, reasons for switching, etc.  However, if you ask these questions only of your current customers, you will only tell half of the story.  The “Right” people are your current customers AND the people who have recently become ex-customers.  Questioning only your current customers will provide a picture of those who are loyal and will not identify all the issues leading to churn.  Recently lost customers provide the contrasting information that will generate the actionable insights needed to address the problem.

Conversely, if you select a valid sample of current and recently churned customers, but ask irrelevant or biased questions, your results will lead to invalid conclusions.  For example, if all competitors require a service contract, asking questions about whether a service contract is a problem, is at least a waste of time and could lead to misinterpretations.  Also, if you ask biased questions, such as “How excellent was your experience with our customer service team”, your results can be positively skewed and could conceal real problems.

Finally, the timing must be “Right”.  With every day that goes by, your company’s churn problem continues.  If it takes three months to complete the research, it may be too late.   Though you don’t want to take shortcuts in your research, you must plan and execute as quickly and as efficiently as possible to provide the insights necessary to resolve their problems in a timely manner.

I’ll address each of these three components of “good” research in greater detail in future blogs, with examples and case studies.  For now, keep in mind that there are no shortcuts to “good” research; Ask the “Right” Questions, of the “Right” People, at the “Right” Time.

 

Carl Fusco

Carl Fusco is a Marketing Research and Consulting Executive skilled at directing the application of research techniques and insights to solve problems and support data-based business decisions. Over his 35-year career, Carl has built a reputation for quality, integrity, and creativity by establishing trust, credibility, and acceptance with clients and associates. He has built a proven track record of success in organizational management and leadership, research design and implementation, and analytic rigor and impact.

Thank you for visiting our blog.

 

Jim Weber, Managing Partner – ITB Partners

Jim Weber – Managing Partner,  ITB Partners

I hope you enjoyed our point of view and would like to receive regular posts directly to your email inbox.  Toward this end, put your contact information on my mailing list.

Your feedback helps me continue to publish articles that you want to read.  Your input is very important to me so; please leave a comment.